|
Selecting Foods of Childrens Cultural Backgrounds for
a Preschool Menu: A Practical Solution
Mary
Smith, MS, RD; Jo Ann Nelson, PhD; Sara Starbuck, MS; and Hea-Ran L. Ashraf,
PhD
ABSTRACT
Purpose/Objectives
Rapidly growing racial and ethnic diversity in the United
States has profound implications for foodservice and nutrition management in
the nations schools. Multicultural awareness among educators fosters appreciation
and respect for the diverse eating habits among children and their families,
thereby expanding learning experiences and nutrition services for children.
Government and professional organizations recommend that all grade levels, including
preschool, include culturally relevant school food programs. The purpose of
this study was to explore practical ways to select and incorporate foods that
reflect cultural backgrounds of children enrolled in a preschool located in
a Midwestern university town.
Methods
A food committee composed of parents and staff members was
established to oversee this project, and children participated in the process.
Eighteen recipes, submitted by parents, were pre-screened by the food committee
for suitability for service to children. In an effort to improve nutritional
composition, some modifications were made to several recipes to reduce fat,
cholesterol, and sodium content. Nine recipes, including three main dishes,
two side dishes, and four desserts, representing seven different ethnic backgrounds,
were recommended for inclusion in the menu through a taste-testing evaluation.
Two recipes were adopted in the menu immediately, and the rest of the recipes
were placed in the recipe file of the Child Development Laboratories (CDL) at
Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. It was indicated that flavor influenced
the acceptance of a dish more than appearance.
Applications to Child Nutrition Professional
Through this project, children and staff were introduced
to various unfamiliar ethnic dishes, and the pool of recipes for menu planning
was expanded. At the same time, operational challenges in adopting new menu
items, such as the limited skills of the kitchen staff and procuring unfamiliar
ingredients, were identified. The strong commitment of management to diversifying
the food program was found to be an important factor for the continued success
of this approach.
INTRODUCTION
Diverse food cultures and habits of Americans make eating an interesting
and enjoyable learning experience for children (Endres, 1994). Early and frequent
exposure to a variety of foods is likely to encourage healthy eating habits
throughout life. As Birch (1987) has demonstrated, the frequency of childrens
exposure to food is strongly related to their taste preferences. A recent study
reported that in 1997, 12.4 million of the 19.6 million American children under
5 years of age were enrolled in some form of regular childcare arrangement during
a typical week (Smith, 2002). It is estimated that there were more than 500,000
daycare provider sites in 2000. These sites include family childcare providers
and preschool facilities sponsored by state and federal government agencies,
churches, hospitals, employer programs, military bases, colleges and universities,
and community service organizations (Marketdata Enterprises, 2001).
Traditionally, children were primarily influenced by their families.
However, todays parents tend to be less reliable food providers than in
the past (Achterberg, 1988; Satter, 1987) and childcare centers and preschool
programs have assumed increasing responsibility for the provision of food. Caregivers
and parents now share responsibility for forming positive feelings about food
and promoting healthful eating practices in young children.
The National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)
recommends that childcare centers serve foods that reflect childrens backgrounds
(NAEYC, 1997). As a goal for school and childcare foodservice professionals,
the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Child Nutrition Programs encourages
planning and preparing healthy meals that appeal to the ethnic and cultural
tastes of children (Food and Nutrition Services, 2003).
In a recently announced joint position paper entitled, Nutrition
services: An essential component of comprehensive school health programs,
the American Dietetic Association (ADA), the Society for Nutrition Education
(SNE), and the American School Food Service Association (ASFSA) provide guidelines
for culturally relevant programs:
Students are more likely to select and eat school meals
when foods meet students taste and cultural preferences and are served
in a supportive, comfortable, attractive, and social environment. School meals
provide an opportunity to reflect and celebrate ethnic communities through preparation
techniques and use of food products. Meals may be marketed in the classroom
and related to the core curriculum; marketed in the cafeteria with signage and
samples; and involve families through menus, take-home newsletters, invitations
to family meals at school and at presentations at parent organizations
(ADA, 2003).
It is suggested that the use of ethnic food should be part of
a childs environment as it extends childrens understanding and appreciation
of their own world and that of others (Wardle, 1991). Multicultural educators
warn, however, about the tendency for well- intentioned programs to adopt a
tourist approach that emphasizes exotic differences between cultures (Derman-Sparks,
1989). A more meaningful approach is the sharing of cultural experiences within
the daily life of the classroom in ways that children can comprehend.
The goal of this study is to explore a practical way of expanding
an existing menu to reflect the cultural diversity of the children enrolled
in a preschool. Specific objectives were to 1) collect from parents recipes
that represented the cultural background of the children; 2) evaluate the nutrient
contents of the recipes; 3) determine the acceptability of these recipes among
children, parents, and staff; and 4) select and recommend approved recipes for
inclusion in the menu.
METHODOLOGY
The Child Development Laboratories (CDL) at Southern Illinois
University at Carbondale serve children from the age of six weeks to six years
and feature a developmentally appropriate and anti-bias curriculum with opportunities
for experiential learning. The university environment and educational philosophy
of CDL encourage children of families with diverse backgrounds to attend. The
center is licensed by the State of Illinois for a total of 69 children. At the
time of the study, 33% of these children were from immigrant or international
families. Twenty-eight children, age three to six may be in attendance in the
preschool at one time. The center is accredited by the NAEYC Academy of Early
Childhood Programs and participates in the Child and Adult Care Food Program
(CACFP).
Food Committee
A popular annual CDL international potluck generated interest
in ethnic food among families and staff. The CDL advisory council decided to
explore ways to include well-liked ethnic foods in the centers menu, and
established an eight-member food committee comprised of parents, teachers, and
foodservice staff to conduct a study. The committees main objective was
to collect, evaluate, and select ethnic recipes for the CDL menu. Information
regarding the project was announced in the CDL newsletter, and families were
asked to submit their favorite recipes.
Modification of Recipes
The food committee held pre-evaluation sessions to assess
the quality and suitability of the 18 recipes submitted. Modifications were
made to several recipes to enhance nutritional composition. Generally, lowfat
varieties of meat and dairy products, and low-sodium butter and soy sauce were
used. In some cases, the amount of cooking oil or fat was reduced. Among the
main dishes, fat content was reduced as much as 15% in an attempt to meet the
goal of 30% calories from fat. Pre-evaluation sessions among the food committee
members provided kitchen staff with a chance to learn new food preparation techniques
and familiarize themselves with unfamiliar ingredients.
Nutrient Content of Items
The nutrient content of the 18 recipes was analyzed using
the Nutritionist IV nutrient analysis program. For each recipe, caloric content
and amount of protein, carbohydrate, fat, cholesterol, calcium, iron, and sodium
were calculated.
Taste-testing and Acceptability of Items
Three taste-testing sessions were held in the mid afternoon
(3:304:30 p.m.) before children were picked up from school. All staff,
parents, and children were invited to participate. Six items two of each
main dish, side dish, and desserts were served buffet-style in serving
dishes. The names of each recipe were shown on cards, and individual plates
and eating utensils were provided. For adults, an evaluation form was used to
rate appearance, flavor, texture, and overall acceptability, each being measured
as very good, good, fair, poor,
and undesirable. This descriptive scale was subsequently converted
into the scale of 5 (very good) down to 1(undesirable). The mean was computed
for each quality. Degrees of correlation between appearance and overall acceptability,
and flavor and overall acceptability were determined (SPSS 11.5),
Recommendation to Include in CDL Menu
The adult survey included a separate form that asked for
opinions regarding the inclusion of individual recipes in the menu. This form
was used to help determine whether the food, although acceptable to an adult,
was considered appropriate to serve to children. The children, alternatively,
were asked to circle a happy or sad face depending on whether they liked the
food or not. It was assumed that a happy face indicated acceptance for the menu.
Items receiving higher than 80% approval from both adult and child tasters were
recommended for inclusion in the menu.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Description of Test Recipes
Table 1 describes the name, origin, and description of the 18 recipes. This set of test recipes
represents 14 cultural backgrounds, including Korean, Greek, Polynesian, Vietnamese,
Russian, Mexican, German, Italian, Irish, Spanish, British, Native American,
French, and Canadian.
| Table 1: Description and Origin of Test Recipes |
| Recipe Name |
Description |
Origin of Recipe |
| Main Dish |
| Chap Chae
|
Cellophane noodles with meat and vegetables
|
Korea
|
| Pastitsio |
Pasta baked with ground beef in bechamel sauce |
Greece |
| Chicken Taro |
Chicken served with taro leaves and coconut milk |
Polynesia |
| Goi Go Pho |
Chicken and cabbage salad |
Vietnam |
| Kotlety |
Soup with roast beef and rice sticks |
Vietnam |
| Pozcharsky |
Baked ground beef mixed with bread |
Russia |
| Side Dish |
| Frijoles Refritos
|
Refried beans with cheese
|
Mexico
|
| Celeriac & Apple Salad |
Cooked celeriac salad |
Germany |
| Pear Salad |
Vegetable salad with pear |
Korea |
| Tex-Mex Rice |
Rice with tomatoes, peas and onions |
Mexico |
| Polenta |
Jellied cooked corn meal |
Italy |
| Mustard Soup |
Soup flavored with mustard and served with lettuce |
Ireland |
| Dessert |
| Flan de Naranja
|
Flan with orange
|
Spain
|
| Lemon Curd tartlets |
Tartlet filled with lemon curd |
Great Britain |
| Indian Pudding |
Cornmeal pudding with ginger and molasses |
Native American |
| Clafouti |
Cherries baked with batter on top |
France |
| Blueberry Crisp |
Blueberries baked with pastry dough on top |
Canada |
| Mexican Bread Pudding |
Bread pudding with apples and cheese |
Mexico |
Nutrient Content of Recipes
As shown in Table 2, caloric content of the three best-liked main dishes ranged from 173 Kcal
to 331 Kcal per serving. Fat content varied from 5.0 gm to 22.1 gm per serving.
The two most-liked side dishes, Tex-Mex rice and frijoles refritos, contained
202 Kcal to 211 Kcal, and 11.8 gm to 18.9 gm fat per serving, respectively.
The two best-liked desserts, blueberry crisp and Mexican bread pudding, contained,
respectively, 294 and 366 Kcal, 49.9 gm and 61.8 gm carbohydrate, and 10.2 and
12.6 gm fat per serving.
| Table 2: Nutrient Content and Meal Component Count of Test Recipes |
| |
Nutrient contents per servingb |
Meal Component Countc |
| Recipe |
Serving Sizea |
Kcal |
Pro. (gm) |
Carb. (gm) |
Fat (gm) |
Ca (mg) |
Fe (mg) |
Meat/
Meat alternate
|
Grains/
Breads |
Veg./
Fruits |
| Chap Chae
|
1/2 c
|
221
|
9.1
|
15.9
|
15.5
|
38
|
1.1
|
1 |
1 |
1/2 |
| Pastitsio |
1/2 c |
331 |
16.3 |
10.7 |
22.1 |
169 |
2.4 |
1.5 |
1 |
|
| Chicken Taro |
1/2 c |
312 |
24.8 |
7.3 |
19.7 |
130 |
5.7 |
2 |
1 |
|
| Goi Go |
1/2 c |
173 |
18.0 |
17.0 |
5.0 |
38 |
3.6 |
1.5 |
|
1 |
| Pho |
1/2 c |
127 |
10.5 |
10.1 |
3.5 |
20 |
1.9 |
1 |
1/2 |
1/2 |
| Kotlety Pozcharsky |
2 oz |
183 |
11.5 |
7.6 |
15.5 |
41 |
1.3 |
1 |
1 |
|
| Frijoles Refritos |
1/2 c |
211 |
15.7 |
11.2 |
18.9 |
395 |
1.5 |
1 |
|
|
| Celeriac & Apple Salad |
1/2 c |
112 |
1.8 |
14.2 |
16.3 |
48 |
0.8 |
|
|
1 |
| Pear Salad |
1/2 c |
97 |
1.2 |
13.2 |
8.2 |
80 |
0.9 |
|
|
1 |
| Tex-Mex Rice |
1/2 c |
202 |
4.4 |
39.6 |
11.8 |
27 |
1.9 |
|
1 |
|
| Polenta |
2" x 4" |
126 |
2.8 |
24.0 |
0.7 |
2 |
1.9 |
|
1 |
|
| Mustard Soup |
1/2 c |
122 |
3.3 |
7.5 |
13.5 |
44 |
0.9 |
|
|
1 |
| Flan de Naranja |
2 oz |
92 |
2.7 |
16.0 |
3.4 |
15 |
0.4 |
1 |
|
|
| Lemon Curd Tartlets |
1/2 ea |
105 |
1.9 |
13.2 |
9.0 |
13 |
0.9 |
1/2 |
1 |
|
| Indian Pudding |
1/2 c |
145 |
3.6 |
16.4 |
6.2 |
205 |
2.8 |
|
1 |
|
| Clafouti |
1/2 c |
126 |
4.7 |
22.8 |
2.8 |
66 |
0.7 |
1/2 |
1 |
1/2 |
| Blueberry Crisp |
1/2 c |
294 |
4.8 |
49.9 |
10.2 |
42 |
1.9 |
|
1 |
1/2 |
| Mexican Bread Pudding |
1/2 c |
366 |
8.9 |
61.8 |
12.6 |
100 |
2.8 |
1 |
1 |
|
aSource: Food Guide Pyramid for Young Children. A daily guide for 4 to 6 year olds. USDA Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion. March 1999. Program Aid 1649.
bNutrient analysis performed using Nutritionist IV (First DataBank Division, The Hearst Corporation, 1111 Bayhill Drive, San Bruno, CA 94066, 1995).
cSource: Child Care Meal Pattern. Child Nutrition, USDA. Retrieved August 25, 2003 from http://www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/care/ProgramBasics/Meals/Lunch.htm.
|
Taste-test and Acceptability of Recipes
Adults taste-test results indicated that of the 18
recipes tested, 15 received good or very good ratings
in overall acceptability (Table 3).
It was shown that adult ratings for overall acceptability of an item were more
apt to be related to flavor (r=0.975, p=0.01) than appearance (r=0.663, p=0.01).
Among all the items tested, frijoles refritos and the blueberry
crisp dessert received a mean overall acceptability rating of 4.7. Pastitsio,
lemon curd tartlets, clafouti, and Mexican bread pudding, received mean ratings
of 4.5 or 4.6. This high acceptance level could be due to the fact that tasters
were familiar with similar dishes. The results are consistent with that of previous
studies showing that familiarity with a dish may result in high approval of
a new recipe (Ashraf & Luczycki, 1990; Cardello & Maller, 1985). Dessert
items, especially baked items, were all highly acceptable to adults, as well
as children. Recipes rated below good included polenta, chicken
taro, and Indian pudding. These items had typically strong, unfamiliar flavors
and appearances.
Consideration for Inclusion in CDL Menu
When asked if they would like to see the item on the CDL
menu, adult responses did not match their ratings for the acceptability (Table 3). In the main dish category, pastitsio, a pasta dish from Greece, received
the highest percentage of approval to include in the menu among adults (94%),
followed by goi go, a Vietnamese chicken dish with cabbage and carrots (93%).
Among side dishes, frijoles refritos received the highest approval from adults
(88%), as well as from children (100%). Of nine recipes that were approved for
inclusion on the menu by both adults and children, only two recipes, Tex-Mex
rice and Mexican bread pudding were immediately adopted for the cycle menu.
The others remained as selections in the CDL recipe file. These two recipes
were easy to prepare, all the ingredients were already in use at CDL, and the
flavors were familiar to adults and children.
| Table 3. Sensory Evaluation Summary of Test Recipes |
| |
Mean Ratings (n=20)a |
Number of Approval for Inclusion in the Menu |
| Recipe |
Appearance |
Flavor |
Texture |
Overall Acceptability |
Adult (n=20) |
Child (n=9) |
| Chap Chae
|
4.2 + 1.0
|
4.5 + 1.2
|
4.2 + 1.2
|
4.3 + 1.2
|
17 |
7 |
| Pastitsiob |
4.5 + 0.6 |
4.7 + 0.6 |
4.6 + 0.6 |
4.5 + 0.6 |
19 |
8 |
| Chicken Taro |
3.3 + 0.8 |
3.7 + 1.1 |
3.1 + 0.8 |
3.6 + 1.1 |
14 |
5 |
| Goi Gob |
4.7 +.5 |
4.5 + 0.9 |
4.5 + 0.7 |
4.3 + 0.8 |
19 |
8 |
| Pho |
4.2 + 0.9 |
4.0 + 1.3 |
4.5 + 0.8 |
4.3 + 1.1 |
15 |
8 |
| Kotlety Pozcharskyb |
4.7 + 0.6 |
4.2 + 0.6 |
4.3 + 1.0 |
4.3 + 1.0 |
18 |
8 |
| Frijoles Refritosb |
4.6 + 0.6 |
4.6 + 0.6 |
4.7 + 0.8 |
4.7 + 0.7 |
18 |
9 |
| Celeriac & Apple Salad |
4.2 + 0.7 |
3.9 + 0.7 |
4.0 + 0.9 |
4.0 + 0.8 |
14 |
8 |
| Pear Salad |
4.6 + 0.6 |
4.3 + 1.1 |
4.5 + 0.8 |
4.2 + 1.1 |
16 |
0 |
| Tex-Mex Riceb |
4.4 + 1.0 |
4.4 + 1.1 |
4.3 + 1.12 |
4.3 + 1.1 |
16 |
8 |
| Polenta |
4.4 + 0.6 |
3.0 + 1.2 |
3.6 + 1.1 |
3.1 + 1.3 |
8 |
3 |
| Mustard Soup |
3.7 + 1.2 |
4.3 + 0.9 |
4.3 + 0.8 |
4.0 + 1.1 |
8 |
0 |
| Flan de Naranja |
4.5 + 0.7 |
3.9 + 0.9 |
3.9 + 0.9 |
4.0 + 0.9 |
13 |
4 |
| Lemon Curd Tartletsb |
4.7 + 0.5 |
4.7 + 0.5 |
3.9 + 1.4 |
4.5 + 0.7 |
18 |
9 |
| Indian Pudding |
3.5 + 1.3 |
1.8 + 1.1 |
3.2 + 1.3 |
2.1 + 1.4 |
2 |
2 |
| Clafoutib |
4.6 + 0.6 |
4.4 + 1.0 |
4.1 + 1.1 |
4.5 + 1.0 |
18 |
9 |
| Blueberry Crispb |
4.5 + 0.9 |
4.7 + 0.5 |
4.7 + 0.5 |
4.7 + 0.5 |
20 |
9 |
| Mexican Bread Puddingb |
4.6 + 0.5 |
4.6 + 0.7 |
4.6 + 0.7 |
4.6 + 0.7 |
19 |
9 |
aValues: Mean + Std. Dev.; Scale: 5 to 1, 5=very good, 4=good, 3=fair, 2=poor, and 1=undesirable
bItems which received 80% or higher approval for inclusion in the menu by both adults (16/20) and children (8/9). These items were recommended for
inclusion in the menu.
|
The main difficulties identified with incorporating some of the
approved items in the existing menu were 1) the kitchen staff needed training
in cooking the wide variety of foods; 2) procurement of unfamiliar ingredients
required flexibility in purchasing; and 3) expanding home-sized recipes to quantity
standardized recipes was needed. The commitment of management was found to be
imperative to implementing this project due to the need for additional staff
time and the cost for new ingredients. However, the cost increase was not significant
for this project. Since the ethnic make-up of a preschool will change over time,
it may be necessary to repeat this process as needed.
Meal Planning Strategies
As shown in Table 2, the majority of dishes tested in this project were mixed foods that provided
more than two meal components under the Child and Adult Care Meal Pattern (Child
Nutrition Program, 2003). For example, pastisio or kotlety pozcharsky could
be served with one serving of steamed vegetables, one serving of fresh fruit,
and a glass of milk, since these entrees supply one serving each of meat and
grains. The meal planner would need to know the nature and amount of major ingredients
for proper counting of meal components.
CONCLUSIONS AND APPLICATION
The present study demonstrates how preschool programs can involve
parents and staff in making informed decisions for diversifying foods on the
menu. Participation by the children, families, and staff greatly enhanced the
likelihood of choosing well-liked foods for the menu. Taste-testing sessions
provided an occasion for sharing family food traditions. Foods from different
cultures were selected for incorporation in the existing menu. Training kitchen
staff for a wider variety of food preparation techniques and procuring uncommon
ingredients were immediate difficulties. The strong commitment of management
for allocating appropriate resources may be required for continuing the implementation
of this program.
Enhancing menus and expanding food items offered in schools have
proven to be vital marketing tools for school foodservice as todays students
have become sophisticated eaters and discriminating diners (Meyer & Conklin,
1998). A recent study also indicates that parental intention to encourage children
to participate in the National School Lunch Program has a strong influence on
the childrens actual participation (Lambert, Conklin, & Johnson, 2002).
Various USDA programs such as Team Nutrition, School Lunch Challenge, and Commodity
Recipe Exchange provide excellent educational activities and foodservice management
materials to assist schools in diversifying their menus (National School Lunch
Program, 2003).
The environment of this study represents one childcare setting
in a Midwestern university community, and the scope is limited to the selection
process of a small number of ethnic foods. To make school lunch programs more
inclusive, future studies may be directed toward developing standardized recipes
representing diverse cultural backgrounds, especially recent immigrant groups.
Developing training materials and strategies for foodservice staff may be needed,
as well. Timely planning, research, and a strong commitment seem to be the key
ingredients for the successful adoption of new flavors in school food programs.
ACKNOWLEGEMENTS
The authors thank Drs. J. Endres and N. Zobairi for their critical
review and valuable suggestions during the preparation of this manuscript. This
article is based on the masters thesis, Incorporating Ethnic Foods
in the Menu at the Child Development Laboratory at Southern Illinois University
at Carbondale, by Mary Smith.
REFERENCES
Achterberg, C. (1988). A perspective on nutrition education research
and practice. Journal of Nutrition Education, 88, 240-243.
American Dietetic Association. (2003). Position of the American
Dietetic Association, Society for Nutrition Education and American School Food
Service Association: Nutrition services: An essential component of comprehensive
school health programs. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 103,
505-514.
Ashraf, H.L., & Luczycki, D. (1990). Acceptability of tofu-containing
foods among college students. Journal of Nutrition Education, 22(3),
137-140.
Birch, L. (1987). The role of experience in childrens food
acceptance patterns. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 87,
S36-S40.
Cardello, A.V., & Maller, O. (1985). Role of consumer expectancies
in the acceptance of novel foods. Journal of Food Science, 50, 1707-1714.
Child Nutrition Program. (2003). Child Care Meal Pattern.
[Available online: http://www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/care/ProgramBasics/Meals/Lunch.htm.]
Derman-Sparks, L., & ABC Task Force. (1989). Anti-bias
curriculum: Tools for empowering young children. Washington, DC: National
Association for the Education of Young Children.
Endres, J. B. & Rockwell, R. E. (1994). Food, nutrition,
and the young child. (4th ed.). New York, NY: Merrill Publishing Co.
Food and Nutrition Services. (2003). Policy statement, Team
nutrition. [Available online: http://www.fns.usda.gov/tn/grants/TN_policystatement.pdf.]
Lambert, L.G., Conklin, M.T., & Johnson, J. T. (2002). Parental
beliefs toward the National School Lunch Program related to elementary student
participation. Journal of child Nutrition and Management, 25. [Available
online: http://www.asfsa.org/childnutrition/jcnm/02fall/lambert.]
Marketdata Enterprises, Inc. (2001). U.S. child day care services,
nanny & au pair agencies: An industry analysis. [Available online: http://www.marketdataenterprises.com/sampledaycare.htm.]
Meyer, M.K., & Conklin, M.T. (1998). Variables affecting high
school students perceptions of school foodservice. Journal of American
Dietetic Association, 98, 1424-31.
National Association for the Education of Young Children. (1997).
Guide to accreditation by the National Academy of Early Childhood Programs.
Washington, DC: Author.
National School Lunch Program. (2003). Healthy School Meals
Resource System. [Available online: http://schoolmeals.nal.usda.gov/index.html.]
Satter, E. (1987). Comments from a practitioner on Leann Birchs
research. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 87, S41.
Smith, K. (2002). Whos minding the kids? Child care arrangements:
Current population reports Spring 1997. Washington, DC: U.S. Census
Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce.
Wardle, F. (1991). Food in a multi-cultural preschool environment.
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of Australia, 16, 232.
BIOGRAPHY
Smith is director of Nutrition Services at the Harrisburg
Medical Center. Nelson is assistant professor for the Department of Curriculum
and Instruction at Southern Illinois University. Starbuck is with the
Illinois Network of Childcare Resource and Referral Agencies. Ashraf is
professor for Department of Animal Science, Food and Nutrition at Southern Illinois
University
|